Microsoft Certified Solutions Developer (MCSD) Certification Practice Test

Which of the following is NOT a benefit of strongly naming assemblies?

1. Ensured uniqueness

2. Version protection

3. Increased compile time

4. Integrity checks

The correct answer is: Increased compile time

Strongly naming assemblies provides several benefits that enhance the security and manageability of applications within the .NET framework. Ensured uniqueness refers to the ability of strongly named assemblies to have a unique identity, which includes the assembly’s name, version number, culture, and public key token. This prevents naming conflicts in scenarios where different versions of the same assembly might be referenced. Version protection gives developers the ability to specify and enforce version dependencies, ensuring that applications can maintain compatibility with their required assembly versions. This is crucial in large projects where assembly versions may change over time. Integrity checks enable the .NET runtime to verify that the assembly has not been tampered with since it was built. This provides a security measure that helps to ensure that the code being executed is indeed the code that was originally intended. In contrast, increased compile time does not fall under the benefits of strongly naming assemblies. In fact, the process of strong naming does not significantly impact compile time; it enhances the runtime behavior and security instead. Therefore, identifying increased compile time as a benefit is incorrect.